At A Glance
You hold FHKCX.O in 0 portfolios
Fidelity China Region (FHKCX.O)
Net Asset Value
33.25USD
-0.20 -0.60%
05/22/2013
Category
World EquityYTD Return (Cumulative)
8.45%Classification
China Region5 Year Return (Annualized)
3.41%Manager Benchmark
Lipper China Reg Fd IXLipper Leader Profile (Overall)
The Growth of $10,000 chart includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, but does not reflect the effect of any applicable sales or redemption charges which would lower these figures.
Fund Profile
| Fund Family | Fidelity Invest |
|---|---|
| Inception Date | 11/01/1995 |
| Portfolio Turnover | 107% |
| Dividend Yield | -- |
| Fund Manager | Bobby Bao |
| Manager Tenure | 2010 |
Fidelity Management & Research Company
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
Fees, Expenses, & Minimums
| Load Type | No load |
|---|---|
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04% |
| Max 12b-1 Fee Ratio | -- |
| Early Redemption Fee | 1.50% |
| Initial Investment | $2,500 |
| Subsequent Investments | $0 |
| Initial IRA Investments | $2,500 |
| Subsequent IRA Investments | $0 |
Investment Strategy
The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. The Fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in securities of Hong Kong, Taiwanese, and Chinese issuers and other investments that are tied economically to the China region. The Fund normally invests in common stocks.
Overall Lipper Leaders Ratings & Fund Profile »
| Similar Rating/ Category | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total Return | 61 | |
| Consistent Return | 61 | |
| Capital Preservation | 10235 | |
| Low Expense | 22 | |
| Tax Efficiency (U.S. only) | 59 |
About the ratings...
Total Return reflects the fund's historical total return performance relative to its peers. Consistent Return reflects the funds's historical risk-adjusted returns relative to its peers. The Capital Preservation is relative, rather that absolute...More »
Lipper Leaders.comAbout the ratings
Lipper Ratings for Total Return reflect funds' historical total return performance relative to peers. Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return reflect funds' historical risk-adjusted returns relative to peers. Lipper Ratings for Preservation are relative, rather than absolute. Lipper Ratings for Tax Efficiency reflect funds' historical ability to postpone taxable distributions. Lipper Ratings for Expense reflect funds' expense minimization relative to peers. Lipper Ratings DO NOT take into account the effects of sales charges. Overall Lipper Ratings are based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for each measure over 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods (if applicable).
