At A Glance
You hold ASCGX.O in 0 portfolios
Adams Hark Sm Cap Gr (ASCGX.O)
Net Asset Value
16.14USD
-0.02 -0.12%
05/20/2013
Category
US Diversified EquityYTD Return (Cumulative)
21.80%Classification
Small-Cap Growth5 Year Return (Annualized)
5.18%Manager Benchmark
Lipper Sm-Cap Growth IXLipper Leader Profile (Overall)
The Growth of $10,000 chart includes reinvestment of dividends and capital gains, but does not reflect the effect of any applicable sales or redemption charges which would lower these figures.
Fund Profile
| Fund Family | |
|---|---|
| Inception Date | 02/27/2004 |
| Portfolio Turnover | 294% |
| Dividend Yield | -- |
| Fund Manager | Mary Lisanti |
| Manager Tenure | 2004 |
AH Lisanti Capital Growth LLC
608 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10020
Fees, Expenses, & Minimums
| Load Type | No load |
|---|---|
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80% |
| Max 12b-1 Fee Ratio | -- |
| Early Redemption Fee | 1.00% |
| Initial Investment | $2,000 |
| Subsequent Investments | $250 |
| Initial IRA Investments | $2,000 |
| Subsequent IRA Investments | $250 |
Investment Strategy
The Fund seeks maximum capital appreciation. To achieve its objective, the Fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets plus borrowings for investment purposes in the common stock of smaller, lesser-known companies whose stocks are traded in the U.S. markets.
Overall Lipper Leaders Ratings & Fund Profile »
| Similar Rating/ Category | ||
|---|---|---|
| Total Return | 442 | |
| Consistent Return | 441 | |
| Capital Preservation | 10235 | |
| Low Expense | 147 | |
| Tax Efficiency (U.S. only) | 442 |
About the ratings...
Total Return reflects the fund's historical total return performance relative to its peers. Consistent Return reflects the funds's historical risk-adjusted returns relative to its peers. The Capital Preservation is relative, rather that absolute...More »
Lipper Leaders.comAbout the ratings
Lipper Ratings for Total Return reflect funds' historical total return performance relative to peers. Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return reflect funds' historical risk-adjusted returns relative to peers. Lipper Ratings for Preservation are relative, rather than absolute. Lipper Ratings for Tax Efficiency reflect funds' historical ability to postpone taxable distributions. Lipper Ratings for Expense reflect funds' expense minimization relative to peers. Lipper Ratings DO NOT take into account the effects of sales charges. Overall Lipper Ratings are based on an equal-weighted average of percentile ranks for each measure over 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods (if applicable).
